![]() Dorothy Gauvin |
Articles of Interest for Artists by Dorothy Gauvin Art Gallery Gauvin To contact Dorothy, click on her photo, which will take you to her web site and e-mail |
|
It’s A Record!
Keeping Track Of Your Artwork
When we start out as artists, the last thing on our minds is the problem future
biographers may have in cataloguing our body of work. Our concern is with making
the art, developing our distinctive style, and finding the subject matter that
passionately engages us.
Who ever started out thinking s/he would end up another Michelangelo? So, who
cares about keeping records of the art we make at the beginning of our career?
Let me tell you who will care:
1. The gallery directors you’ll approach to represent you.
The Future always arrives sooner than we expect. If you haven’t kept an orderly
record of your work as you went along, you’d be faced with a daunting task when
you need to produce it. And if it’s Number Five who suddenly wants those details,
it could be a serious problem.
The records you need to keep fall into three categories:
1. Photographic
Because each category holds its own importance to you, we’ll leave the Ledger and
Business sections for another article and tackle only the Photographic here.
Whenever you complete a painting you are confident is worth displaying – whether
for entry in a charity art show, a competition, or for consideration by a gallery –
photograph it! Label the print and put it in a presentation folio or album.
TIP: Never write straight onto the back of the photo, as your lettering
will eventually show through. Instead, write the title on a stick-on label and
then attach that to the back of the photo.
You’ll no doubt have heard that gallery directors demand a 35mm slide or a
transparency (both positive film) for viewing your work. This is not always, or
even usually, true. You see, gallery directors have little time to spare setting
up a light box or projector to view samples by an aspiring artist. From many years
of experience, all they need is a swift scan of a bunch of photos to tell them all
they need to know.
In fact, during your early approaches to galleries, a bunch of photos can work
to your advantage. The experienced director can lay them out on a desk and see at
a glance where your true direction lies. Among the many and varied styles and
subject matter you’ll no doubt have presented, s/he’ll note the pieces that have
"authority." By that I mean those works which show a consistent and confident
display of your talents. If s/he comments on these, you’ll know s/he’s interested.
If you take heed of the advice s/he gives, you’re well on your way to a successful
career.
TIP: If your aim is to be shown in government-subsidised public galleries,
you will need to provide an "Artist’s Statement." This should consist of as much
obscure jargon and incomprehensible nonsense as you can dream up. The curator will
be comfortable with this, as it’s how s/he has been trained.
But if you want success in the real world, don’t trot out something like this at
an interview with a private gallery. Private gallery people are business people.
Their job – their reason for being – is to sell art. Their customers want to buy
art. High-flown posturing impresses neither of them. While both are interested in
the passions that motivate you, their intelligence will gather all that from your
work.
If your work really is good, it does all the talking for you.
|
After your career is well established, clients who have collected your art may ask to see some examples of your earlier work. It’s good if you, or the gallery representing you, can satisfy their curiosity with pictures of these paintings. Some collectors are eager to purchase any unsold pieces from this period. Features editors on newspapers and journals appreciate pictures to go with any articles they may run about you and your art. In your early days, they are unlikely to send a staff photographer out, so it’s good to have some relevant photos on hand to give them. I say "give them" because, despite promises that are genuine at the time, few press people ever remember to return your material. TIP: In these days of electronic printing, it’s not necessary to provide transparencies to newspapers, journals or magazines. Ordinary colour photo prints are usually all that’s needed. Transparencies will be needed when it comes to reproducing your artwork as limited edition prints or as illustrations in a book. By that time, you should be routinely photographing your work in positive film, preferably in the large square format. (The film is then sent to a lab that will make the transparencies.) At the start, it will seem easier to engage a professional but, as always, there are disadvantages.
1. Hefty fees for the photographer and perhaps an assistant. My solution was to buy the special camera required, and learn to do the job myself. Such cameras cost several thousand dollars, but you will soon recoup your outlay in the savings on fees for a photographer. Some photo labs sell second-hand cameras for as little as half-cost. You can do the job when it suits you and the weather. And if something has gone wrong, you can quickly and cheaply redo it. There are many books on how to photograph artwork, but here are the basics:
1. Best results come from photographing the art outdoors, in morning sunlight. Finally, like many careful artists, I do not recommend using a digital camera for this purpose. I’d need to see a lot of improvement in the technology before I’d feel comfortable doing so. The reason is simple: The quality of reproduction depends on the quality of the original material, whether photo print, negative, or positive film. No amount of "massaging" on any software editor can redeem a poor image. So my advice is to stick with a good SLR camera (with at least one extra lens) for general purposes, plus a square format camera for producing transparencies. In a future article, we’ll talk about those all-important written records, plus how to keep all your files safe and readily accessible. |